top of page
Image-empty-state.png

Carl Bruner

Mar 2020

$

800

Carl had always maintained his innocence and that he was being framed. His appellate defense argues that they were not allowed to cross-examine Carl's accuser because the witness was not present and his testimony in another man's trial was simply read in court.

© 2009-2024 
PROVING INNOCENCE
All rights reserved.

P.O. Box Closing Dec 2024

P.O. Box 2010

Royal Oak, MI 48068-9998

bottom of page